Below is a brief overview of some solutions which may improve a supplier’s resilience:
- retain title to goods supplied until all payments due from the customer are made;
- periodic monitoring for example are customer’s accounts filed on time, any CCJs/winding up proceedings commenced, audit of stock segregation conditions at customer premises if holding goods supplied which are not yet paid for;
- is credit insurance available?;
- monitor and review level of credit exposure; and
- procure payment on account.
Below is a brief overview of some solutions which may improve a customer’s resilience:
- identify key suppliers;
- consider whether there are any alternative suppliers and what the timeframe would be for them to replace one of your existing suppliers?;
- monitor potential knock on impact on your ability to deliver an onward supply contract; and
- in the event of supplier distress, would that provide an opportunity to acquire assets/bring part of the production in-house?
Disputes shall be settled on the basis of the facts available at the time the dispute arose. For example, disputes concerning force majeure require a statement on the presence of force majeure at a certain point in time, so in general, the removal of restrictions does not affect the subject matter of the dispute.
Irrespective of the lifting of restrictions, disputes shall be solved by judgment unless the dispute is settled. However, an amicable solution is always an option worth considering.
In all cases, it is important to file a notice to the contracting party and to check whether the contract contains an agreed procedure for such an exceptional situation or other provisions on the effect of the exceptional situation on the contractual relationship. In such situations, it would be advisable to contact your legal counsel.
In Finland, a mass claim can only be brought in consumer matters against companies and an action can only be brought by a consumer ombudsman. Industries at specific risk include tour operators, airlines and shipping companies. Third party funding is not a possibility in these consumer cases.
We recommend that changes made as a result of COVID-19 be recorded in the contract, for example in the form of a supplement or addition to the contract, and that these changes be taken into account when concluding a new contract.
We recommend that you consider the possibility of a delay and agree on a procedure in the event of a such. In other respects, we recommend adhering to existing agreements and their processes to avoid other unnecessary risks.
We recommend supplementing the force majeure condition to cover situations caused by pandemics. However, it would be important to assess each contractual relationship individually and carefully in order to maintain a contractual balance and avoid unfair contract terms.